Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Construction of gene regulatory networks by integrating targeted perturbation data with binding data.

The relations in constructed gene regulatory network correspond to direct regulatory interactions.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Assessment of currently available genome-scale gold-standard networks used by prior gene network reverse-engineering studies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Gold-standard gene regulatory network #1.

Transcription factors are shown with large blue circles, and other genes are shown with small green circles. Edges in the network represent direct regulatory interactions. Inhibiting edges are shown with red, and excitatory edges are shown with black.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Direct regulatory interactions between transcription factors in gold-standard gene regulatory network #1.

Inhibiting edges are shown with red, and excitatory edges are shown with black.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Topological analysis of gold-standard gene regulatory network #1.

The analysis was performed in Cytoscape with NetworkAnalyzer.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 2.

Overlapping identified binding with regulatory relations results in gold-standard networks with direct regulatory relations.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Sensitivity and specificity.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Euclidean distance from the optimal algorithm with sensitivity = 1 and specificity = 1.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 5.

ROC curve of the Pareto frontier for sensitivity/specificity pairs obtained by application of 18 network reverse-engineering approaches to 13 datasets.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

ROC curves of the Pareto frontier for sensitivity/specificity pairs obtained by application of 18 network reverse-engineering approaches to datasets of each type.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 5.

Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Euclidean distance from the optimal algorithm with PPV = 1 and NPV = 1.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Recall (sensitivity) and precision (PPV).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Euclidean distance from the optimal algorithm with Sensitivity = 1 and PPV = 1.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Figure 7.

Example scatter-plot of transcription factor connectivity versus the accuracy (combined PPV/NPV metric) of reconstructing their sub-networks.

The left panel shows the scatter-plot and the right panel shows the null distribution for establishing statistical significance of the observed correlation.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Table 9.

Number of networks that have significant correlations between transcription factor connectivity and accuracy of reconstructing their sub-networks.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Datasets used for gene regulatory network reverse-engineering.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Statistical approaches used for gene regulatory network reverse-engineering.

More »

Table 11 Expand