Figure 1.
Flow chart of study selection process.
Table 1.
Characteristics of 7 included studies.
Table 2.
Scores of Downs and Black Scale.
Figure 2.
Forest plot comparing uncorrected distance visual acuity (log MAR) after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens (First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; SMD = standardized mean difference).
Figure 3.
Forest plot comparing uncorrected distance visual acuity (log MAR) after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens according to different following-up time.
Short term means short-term following-up, long term means long-term following-up. (First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; SMD = standardized mean difference).
Table 3.
Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (log MAR).
Figure 4.
Forest plot comparing the number of eyes achieving 20/20 (Snellen) or better after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens.
(First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk).
Figure 5.
Forest plot comparing the number of eyes achieving 20/40 (Snellen) or better after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens.
(First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk).
Table 4.
The number of eyes that achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better at the last follow-up visit.
Table 5.
The number of eyes that achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better at the last follow-up visit.
Figure 6.
Forest plot comparing the number of eyes losing one or more lines of best spectacle corrected visual acuity after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens.
(First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk).
Table 6.
The number of the eyes losing one or more lines of best spectacle corrected visual acuity at the last follow-up visit.
Figure 7.
Forest plot comparing the number of eyes gaining one or more lines of spectacle corrected visual acuity after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens.
(First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk).
Table 7.
The number of the eyes gaining one or more lines of best spectacle corrected visual acuity at the last follow-up visit.
Figure 8.
Forest plot comparing all the reported complications of eyes after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens.
(First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk).
Table 8.
Descriptions of all complications in 7 included studies.
Figure 9.
Forest plot comparing the eyes with severe complications after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens.
(First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk).
Figure 10.
Forest plot comparing the number of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±0.5 D of the intended target after implanting Implantable Collamer Lens and iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens.
(First author and year of publication of each study given) (CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk).
Table 9.
The number of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±0.5 D of the intended target.