Table 1.
List of subjects by age and sex.
Table 2.
Test and subtest for each domain of neuropsychological assessment of children (ENI).
Figure 1.
Corpus callosum segmentation as proposed by Park et al., (2008).
A) CC delineated on T1w of sample subject.
Figure 2.
A) Average score obtained for each component of the neuropsychological assessment of children (ENI). B) Corpus callosum area adjusted for mid-sagittal total area brain (TAB). C) Average mid-sagittal ADC in each CC region.
Figure 3.
Correlation between ENI and corpus callosum area adjusted for mid-sagittal total area of the brain (TAB).
A) Verbal fluency and CC region II. B) Language expression and CC region V. C) Cognitive Flexibility and CC region VI. Girls are represented as black circles, while boys are denoted by squares.
Table 3.
Correlations between neuropsychological assessment of children (ENI) and the CC region area (see figure 1).
Figure 4.
Correlations between ENI and ADC values (mm3/s).
A) Language repetition and CC region III ADC. B) Tactile perception and CC region III ADC. Girls are represented as black circles, while boys are denoted by squares.
Table 4.
Correlations between neuropsychological assessment of children (ENI) and ADC of the CC region (see figure 1).