Figure 1.
Map showing locations of sampling.
A, view of Central America. Belize and Panama are indicated and their borders marked in red. B, close-up of Belize. The location of sampling, Carry Bow Cay, is indicated and highlighted within a yellow circle. C, Close-up of Panama. Bocas del Toro and Naos regions are each indicated and locations of sampling highlighted with a yellow circle.
Table 1.
Field stations at Belize where specimens of Nemertea were found.
Table 2.
Field stations at Bocas del Toro where specimens of Nemertea were found.
Table 3.
Field stations at Naos region, Panama where specimens of Nemertea were found.
Table 4.
List of taxa (22) found at different stations in Belize.
Table 5.
List of taxa (19) found at different stations in Bocas del Toro.
Table 6.
List of taxa (26) found at different stations in Naos region.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic relationships of the 106 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) haplotypes within the genus Cephalothrix spp.
The consensus of 75,000 sampled trees from Bayesian analysis of the COI data sets is shown, displaying all compatible groupings, with average branch lengths proportional to numbers of substitutions per site under a general time reversible +I+G substitution model. Posterior probabilities from the Bayesian reconstruction and bootstrap support from the maximum likelihood reconstruction are shown below and above each branch, respectively. Support values are not shown for values below 0.8 for posterior probabilities, 80 for bootstrap support and for within-species short branches. Each species is indicated and grouped with a red box at left of tips, on its right the corresponding number of the entity (E.). Localities are shown and the ones where specimens for this work were collected are in blue, with the relative number of station between brackets. Morphotypes are presented on right. Unidentified species (C. spp.) are indicated only when specimens were collected for the present study.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic relationships of the 70 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) haplotypes within the genus Ototyphlonemertes spp.
The consensus of 75,000 sampled trees from Bayesian analysis of the COI data sets is shown, displaying all compatible groupings, with average branch lengths proportional to numbers of substitutions per site under a general time reversible +I+G substitution model. Posterior probabilities from the Bayesian reconstruction and bootstrap support from the maximum likelihood reconstruction are shown below and above each branch, respectively. Support values are not shown for values below 0.8 for posterior probabilities, 80 for bootstrap support and for within-species short branches. Each species is indicated and grouped with a red box at left of tips, on its right the relative number of the entity (E.). Localities are shown and the ones where specimens for this work were collected are in blue, with the relative number of station between brackets. Morphotypes are presented on right.
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic relationships of the 40 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) haplotypes within the genus Tetrastemma spp.
The consensus of 75,000 sampled trees from Bayesian analysis of the COI data sets is shown, displaying all compatible groupings, with average branch lengths proportional to numbers of substitutions per site under a general time reversible +I+G substitution model. Posterior probabilities from the Bayesian reconstruction and bootstrap support from the maximum likelihood reconstruction are shown below and above each branch, respectively. Support values are not shown for values below 0.8 for posterior probabilities, 80 for bootstrap support and for within-species short branches. Each species is indicated and grouped with a red box at left of tips, on its right the relative number of the entity (E.). Localities are shown and the ones where specimens for this work were collected are in blue, with the relative number of site between brackets. Morphotypes are presented on right. Unidentified species (T. spp.) are indicated only when specimens were collected for the present study.
Table 7.
Number of entities (E.) for each analysed genus.