Figure 1.
Phylogeographic relationships of Tarsius syrichta (see Appendix S1 for taxonomic summary) estimated from a combined, partitioned, RAxML ML analysis of mitochondrial (12S, CytB, ND2) gene fragments.
Black circles at nodes correspond to ML bootstraps ≥70% and Bayesian PP ≥95%.
Figure 2.
DISTRUCT visualization of STRUCTURE analyses (A) assigning individuals to major population groupings (genetically distinct evolutionary lineages) for Philippine tarsier demes (K = 2 and 3 populations).
Mindanao faunal region (B; see Fig. 1, inset) with sampling (17 sites, 66 individuals) labeled with letters corresponding to full localities listed in Appendix S2, protected areas shaded red. SplitsTree gene network (C; numbers at internodes = ML bootstrap replicates), and results of GMYC analyses (red asterisks denote lineages delineated by the Yule-coalescent), with numbers at tips corresponding to individual samples in Structure plots (A) and cluster shading corresponding to islands on map (B).
Table 1.
Models of evolution selected by AIC and applied for partitioned, phylogeographic analyses1.
Table 2.
Microsatellite variation in 66 individuals of Tarsius syrichta from 17 localities (Fig. 2).
Table 3.
Locus-specific microsatellite variation in 66 individuals of Tarsius syrichta from 17 localities (Fig. 2).
Table 4.
Uncorrected mitochondrial sequence divergence (%) among Philippine tarsier (Tarsius syrichta) evolutionary lineages shown below diagonal.
Table 5.
Identities by geographical region and numbers (in parentheses) of Philippine tarsier (Tarsius syrichta) evolutionary lineages, putative taxa, or conservation targets inferred (new data and analyses) or predicted (biogeography, taxonomy) from each of the five available sources of information.