Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

MID paradigm.

The task requires a fast button press after a flash, indicated by either a laughing or a scrambled smiley, to receive either monetary or verbal feedback.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Left: neuronal activity (pFWE<.05; ROI corr.) for the contrast monetary > verbal reward during reward anticipation by early family adversity (EFA) in a) left VS, b) left putamen and c) left thalamus; right: scatterplots of the correlations between the mean BOLD response of the respective regions and EFA; d) left: Scalp distribution of CNV difference (monetary > verbal condition; mean difference: 2–3 sec after stimulus presentation) dependent on EFA; right: scatterplot of the correlation between CNV difference at Cz (marked with an asterisk) and EFA [F(1,160) = 9.14, p = .003].

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Left: neuronal activity (pFWE<.05; ROI corr.) for the contrast win > no-win trials during reward delivery by EFA in a) right insula, b) right pallidum and c) left putamen; right: scatterplots of the correlations between the mean BOLD response of the respective regions and EFA.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Left: neuronal activity (pFWE<.05; ROI corr.) for the contrast verbal win > no-win trials during reward delivery by EFA in a) right pallidum, b) right insula, c) left substantia nigra and d) right posterior hippocampus; right: scatterplots of the correlations between the mean BOLD response of the respective regions and EFA.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 1.

Regional BOLD changes to monetary > verbal reward by EFA.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Regional BOLD changes to win > no-win trials by EFA.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Regional BOLD changes to verbal win > no-win trials by EFA.

More »

Table 3 Expand