Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the domain structure of ADAM10.

(A) The cytoplasmic tail at the C-terminus harbors two proline-rich regions (PRR) that might enable binding to SH3 or WW domain-containing proteins. The intracellular parts of human and murine ADAM10 are highly conserved and differ in only one amino acid. (B) Modular composition, maturation and processing of ADAM10. The N-terminal signal sequence of the protease is needed for intracellular maturation (1→2). To generate an enzymatically active protease, the pro-domain has to be removed by a protein convertase such as furin (2→3). The catalytic metalloproteinase domain is the largest domain of ADAM10 and might be activated by different signals including substrate-induced conformational changes at the plasma membrane (3→4). The membrane-proximal region is important for adhesion and substrate recognition and contains a disintegrin, a cysteine-rich and an EGF-like domain. ADAM10 itself is subjected to proteolysis by ADAM9 or ADAM15 and the γ–secretase complex (4→5). The fate and functions of the soluble ectodomain or the resulting C-terminal fragments are still unclear. Notably, intracellular regions at all stages might interact with individual SH3 domain-containing interaction partners.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

GST-hADAM10(697-748)-precipitated SH3 domains: Function and localization of putative interaction partners according to the UniProt Protein Knowledgebase (UniprotKB).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

GST/GST-hADAM10(697–748)- and GST-interacting SH3 domains.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

Verification of the interaction between ADAM10 and EEN.

(A) In order to verify the potential interaction of ADAM10 with Endophilin-A2/EEN, HEK 293T cells were either left untransfected or transfected with HA-tagged murine ADAM10 alone or in combination with human Endophilin-A2/EEN. 18 h later, the cells were lysed and immunoprecipitations (IPs) were performed with monoclonal antibodies directed against the HA-tag (clone 3F10) or EEN (clone 2F5), respectively. Protein input for IPs was 1.8 or 2 mg of protein, respectively. Of note: at the employed exposure time, endogenous EEN is hardly detectable in the whole cell lysates containing a total of 10 µg of protein. (B) Pull down analyses were performed from PHA blasts (day 16) using a GST fusion protein containing the SH3 domain of EEN coupled to GST (EEN SH3) and GST as a control. The subsequent Western blot was probed with anti-ADAM10 (clone 11G2).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Interactions between ADAM10 and non-receptor protein tyrosine kinases and adaptor proteins of the Grb2 family.

(A) Lysates from Jurkat T cells (here JFL) were used for pull down analyses with SH2 or SH3 domain fusion proteins of non-receptor PTKs as indicated. GST served as a negative control. Protein input of the whole cell lysate was 15 µg. 10 µg of the respective fusion proteins were used for precipitation from 1 ml of cell lysate with 3.2 mg/ml of protein. MAb 11G2 was used to detect ADAM10 after Western blotting. (B) Immunoprecipitations were performed from Jurkat T cells (here JE6-1) using 2 µg of mAbs against Lck (clones 4/129 and 4/215) or ADAM10 (clone 11G2). Protein G beads served as a control for unspecific binding. Input of the cellular lysate was 15 µg; precipitates were performed from 1 ml of lysate (1 mg/ml protein). MAb 11G2 was used to detect ADAM10 by Western blotting. (C) Jurkat cells (JE6-1) were lysed and one ml of lysate containing 900 µg/ml protein was subjected to precipitation using 10 µg GST or the GST fusion protein containing the intracellular part of human ADAM10 (hADAM10(697–748)). In parallel, ADAM10 was precipitated using 2 µg/ml of mAb 11G2 with protein G beads serving as a control. Precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted on nitrocellulose. The blot was stained with a polyclonal anti-Grb2 antibody and re-probed with a polyclonal anti-ADAM10 antiserum (“animal 1”). (D) C- and N-terminal SH3 domains of Grb2, GRAP and GRAP2 fused to GST (10 µg each) were used for precipitations from Jurkat T cells (here JFL; 2.2 mg/ml protein input per precipitation) with GST alone serving as a control. 15 µg protein of the whole cell lysate were included as a reference. ADAM10 was detected with mAb 11G2.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

The intracellular domains of ADAM10 and ADAM17 interact with sorting nexins and PACSINs.

(A) HEK 293T cells were either left untransfected or were transfected with a control vector (p12linker) or with HA-tagged SNX9, SNX18 or SNX33. 18 h later, cells were lysed and precipitations were performed with 25 µg of GST, GST-hADAM10(697–748) or GST-hADAM17(694–824), respectively. Western blots were developed using mAb 3F10 directed against the HA-tag of the sorting nexins. Lysates (20 µg/lane) were stained as a control. (B) HEK 293T cells were left untransfected or transfected with control vector (pcDNA3.1) or with myc-tagged PACSIN1, PACSIN2 or PACSIN3. 18 h post transfection, cells were lysed and precipitations were performed with 10 µg of GST, GST-hADAM10(697–748) or GST-hADAM17(694–824). Precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Blots were developed with mAb clone 46–0603 directed against the myc-tag. Of the whole cell lysates, 5 µg of protein were separated to verify efficient transfection. (C) Recombinant GST fusion proteins (15 µg) containing individual SH3 domains of PACSIN1-3 were used to precipitate endogenous ADAM10 from lysates of Jurkat T cells (JFL, 1 ml each; 2.2 mg/ml). GST served as a negative control. 10 µg of whole cell lysate was used as a control to detect ADAM10 using mAb 11G2.

More »

Figure 4 Expand