Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

BAFBA Flowchart.

Note: Red-dotted box is Flux Balance Analysis which is hybridized into standard BA as an objective function in order to predict the effect of gene knockout.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Overall framework of DBFBA with OptKnock.

Note: Red-dotted box is DE algorithm that is hybridized into BAFBA in order to improve the local search performance of BAFBA. Green-dotted box is OptKnock validation that has been integrated into DBFBA in this paper.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Pseudo code of DBFBA.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Bee representation of metabolic genotype [6].

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

The flow of fitness calculation.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

The flow of OptKnock validation.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 1.

Mathematical representation of De Jong Martin & Gaddy, Schwefel, and Griewangk functions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Obtained fitness value of all benchmark functions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison between different methods for growth rate and BPCY Succinic acid by E.coli.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison between different methods for growth rate and BPCY of Lactic acid by E.coli.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 7.

Comparison between different methods for growth rate and BPCY of Succinic acid by E.coli.

Note: BPCY is in gram (gram-glucose.hour)−1. Unit for growth rate is hr−1.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Flux map of the production of succinic acid.

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Figure 9.

Comparison between different methods for growth rate and BPCY of Lactic acid by E.coli.

Note: BPCY is in gram (gram-glucose.hour)−1. Unit for growth rate is hr−1.

More »

Figure 9 Expand

Figure 10.

Flux map of the production of lactic acid.

More »

Figure 10 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison between different methods for growth rate and BPCY of ethanol by B.subtilis.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 11.

Comparison between different methods for growth rate and BPCY of Ethanol by B.subtilis.

Note: BPCY is in gram (gram-glucose.hour)−1. Unit for growth rate is hr−1.

More »

Figure 11 Expand

Figure 12.

Comparison between different methods for production of Ethanol by C. thermocellum.

Note: BPCY is in gram (gram-glucose.hour)−1. Unit for growth rate is hr−1.

More »

Figure 12 Expand

Figure 13.

Convergence graph of different methods for ethanol production in B.subtilis.

More »

Figure 13 Expand

Figure 14.

Convergence graph of different methods for ethanol production in C.thermocellum.

More »

Figure 14 Expand

Table 6.

Comparison between different methods for growth rate and BPCY of ethanol by C.thermocellum.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison between average computational time of DBFBA and BAFBA for 1000 iterations.

More »

Table 7 Expand