Figure 1.
Sampling locations in Manus, North Fiji, and Lau Basins.
Dashed lines: subduction zones. Figure originally published in Thaler et al. [11].
Table 1.
Chorocaris spp. and Munidopsis lauensis sampling locations in Manus, North Fiji, and Lau Basin.
Table 2.
Chorocaris spp. and Munidopsis lauensis.
Figure 2.
Statistical parsimony network for haplotypes from samples collected in Manus and North Fiji Basin. Large circles represent a single individual unless noted on the figure. Small black circles represent inferred haplotypes not observed in this data set. Each node represents 1 pb difference.
Table 3.
Chorocaris sp. 2, Manus Basin.
Table 4.
Chorocaris sp. 2 and Munidopsis lauensis pairwise comparisons of Solwara 8, Solwara 1, South Su, North Fiji, and Lau Basin genetic differentiation.
Figure 3.
Statistical parsimony network for Munidopsis lauensis haplotypes from the western Pacific.
Dominant haplotype contains 111 individuals, including four representative sequence recovered from GenBank—Desmos Caldera (Manus Basin; EF157850; [29]), Mariner Vent Field (Lau Basin; EF157851; [29]), Hine Hina (Lau Basin; EF157852; [29]), and Brothers Seamount (New Zealand; EF157853; [29])—indicated with an asterisk. Each node represents 1 bp difference.
Table 5.
Munidopsis lauensis microsatellite summary statistics for nine loci Manus and Lau Basin.
Figure 4.
Munidopsis lauensis structure output for seven microsatellite loci shared across Manus and Lau Basin.
Each color represents a different putative population inferred from the distribution of allele frequencies. K = 3 was determined to be the most likely model based on 5 replicates each of model runs from k = 1 to k = 7, with a 1,000,000 step burn-in period followed by 10,000,000 steps. Sampling locations were used as priors for putative population assignments.