Table 1.
Factor Analysis of the SESQ (Study 1).
Table 2.
Correlations of SESQ dimensions with cognitive style, personality traits, and political ideology (Study 2).
Table 3.
Correlations of SESQ dimensions with Dweck et al.'s Implicit Person Theories and Church et al.'s Implicit Trait and Implicit Contextual Theories (Study 3).
Figure 1.
SESQ dispositionism and spontaneous inferences.
SESQ dispositionism strongly predicts increased levels of spontaneous trait inference (STI) and weakly predicts decreased levels of spontaneous situation inference (SSI).
Figure 2.
SESQ historicism and the Fundamental Attribution Error.
SESQ historicism predicts increased sensitivity to the choice manipulation of the classic Jones and Harris (1967) paradigm, and thus a reduced tendency to commit the FAE.
Figure 3.
SESQ controllability and blame.
SESQ controllability predicts polarization of moral judgments. Among those scoring high on SESQ controllability, perceived control and blame are intensified for relatively controllable stigmas, but attenuated for relatively uncontrollable stigmas. *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001.