Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

List of Genes Assessed.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Dataset Clinical features.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

Box plot of pan-wildtype vs. K-ras mutation.

A) (Top Panel): Positive skewness with fine-texture significantly differentiates K-ras mutation from pan-wildtype (p = 0.031). B) (Bottom Panel): Lower kurtosis with coarse-texture significantly differentiates K-ras mutation from pan-wildtype (p = 0.009).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Decision-tree for identification of KRAS mutations using QTA parameters.

M-Numbers of mutants; WT-number of pan-wildtype; SD-standard deviation; ssf-spatial scale factor.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Overall survival curves based on QTA.

A) (Left Panel): Without filtration, higher skewness (green line, median OS 30.7 months) vs. lower skewness (blue line, median OS 89.4 months) was associated with inferior OS (p = 0.012). B) (Right Panel): Without filtration, lower kurtosis (green line, median OS 61.6 months) vs. higher kurtosis (blue line, median OS 93.2 months) was associated with inferior OS (p = 0.012).

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Disease free survival curves based on QTA.

Lower kurtosis with coarse-texture (green line, median DFS 59.6 months) had inferior OS vs. higher kurtosis (blue line, median DFS 93.2 months)(p = 0.048).

More »

Figure 4 Expand