Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Time course of the experiment.

CPT: cold pressor test. NWR: nociceptive withdrawal reflex.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Thresholds before and after the cold pressor test (CPT).

Nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) thresholds, electrical pain detection thresholds and pain intensity ratings to suprathreshold stimulation are shown for both sessions. **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 1.

Variations in the assessment measures due to conditioned pain modulation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 3.

Magnitude of the conditioned pain modulation effect (ΔCPM) for both sessions.

Assessment was performed with the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) thresholds, electrical pain detection thresholds and pain intensity ratings to suprathreshold stimulation.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Bland-Altman plots of the magnitude of the conditioned pain modulation effect (ΔCPM).

Assessment was performed with the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) thresholds, electrical pain detection thresholds and pain intensity ratings to suprathreshold stimulation. The dashed line indicates the bias between sessions, whereas the dotted lines indicate the limits of agreement, calculated as ±1.96 times the standard deviation (SD) of the differences in measurements between sessions.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 2.

Reliability of the assessment measures before and during conditioned pain modulation.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Reliability of the conditioned pain modulation effect.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Hypothetical sample sizes of crossover () and parallel () experimental designs as a function of the effect size.

More »

Table 4 Expand