Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Water footprint of Morocco’s production per river basin.

Period: 1996–2005. Morocco’s river basins (A) and total green (B), blue (C) and grey (D) water footprint of Morocco’s production per river basin (in Mm3/yr).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Water footprint estimates included in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of river basins based on reference evapotranspiration (ET0 in mm/yr, period: 1961–1990).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Water footprint of Morocco’s production in the period 1996–2005 (in Mm3/yr).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

Economic water productivity and green and blue water footprint of main crops in Morocco.

Period: 1996–2005. Source: Water footprint from Mekonnen and Hoekstra [14], producer prices from FAO [18].

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Variation in green plus blue water consumption (in m3/ton) across river basins.

Period: 1996–2005.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Economic land productivity and harvested area of main crops in Morocco.

Period: 1996–2005. Source: Harvested area and yield from Mekonnen and Hoekstra [14], producer prices from FAO [18].

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Morocco’s virtual water trade balance related to trade in agricultural and industrial commodities.

Period: 1996–2005. Source: Virtual water import and (total) virtual water export from Mekonnen and Hoekstra [13].

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Total blue water footprint and natural runoff per river basin.

Period of blue water footprint: 1996–2005. Natural runoff is estimated as the long-term average inflow of reservoirs. It is considered undepleted runoff, since large-scale blue water withdrawals come from the reservoirs. The estimates can be considered conservative, because net precipitation in areas downstream of reservoirs is not included.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 4.

Blue water scarcity per river basin.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Blue water scarcity related to groundwater.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Water pollution level related to nitrate-nitrogen in groundwater.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Potential water savings by partial relocation of crop production per crop.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Potential water savings by partial relocation of crop production per river basin.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Potential water savings by benchmarking water productivities of main crops* (in Mm3/yr).

More »

Table 9 Expand