Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Proportion of the variance in each EPIC center captured in an overall PCA on combined data by the number of PC retained.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Loading matrix and explained variances for the first four Principal Components (PC) identified by PCA*.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Deviation (%) of the 24-HDR mean intakes from the overall EPIC means among participants in the quintiles of PC1 scores for nutrients (A) and foods (B).

Means are adjusted for age, sex, height, weight and energy and weighted for day and season of recall (N = 34,436). The reference circle of the radius (100%) correspond to the ‘EPIC means’ and the spikes indicate the deviation of the specific nutrient mean in quintiles of pattern scores from the reference ‘EPIC means’.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Deviation (%) of the 24-HDR mean intakes from the overall ‘EPIC means’ among participants in the quintiles of PC2 scores for nutrients (A) and foods (B).

Means are adjusted for age, sex, height, weight and energy and weighted for day and season of recall (N = 34,436). The reference circle of the radius (100%) correspond to the ‘EPIC means’ and the spikes indicate the deviation of the specific nutrient mean in quintiles of pattern scores from the reference ‘EPIC means’.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Deviation (%) of the 24-HDR mean intakes from the overall ‘EPIC means’ among participants in the quintiles of PC3 scores for nutrients (A) and foods (B).

Means are adjusted for age, sex, height, weight and energy and weighted for day and season of recall (N = 34,436). The reference circle of the radius (100%) correspond to the ‘EPIC means’ and the spikes indicate the deviation of the specific nutrient mean in quintiles of pattern scores from the reference ‘EPIC means’.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Deviation (%) of the 24-HDR mean intakes from the overall ‘EPIC means’ among participants in the quintiles of PC4 scores for nutrients (A) and foods (B).

Means are adjusted for age, sex, height, weight and energy and weighted for day and season of recall (N = 34,436). The reference circle of the radius (100%) correspond to the ‘EPIC means’ and the spikes indicate the deviation of the specific nutrient mean in quintiles of pattern scores from the reference ‘EPIC means’.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 2.

Multiple regression derived coefficients (β) and standard errors (SE) of specified predictors for the four nutrient pattern scores*.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

P-values of F-test on type III sum of squares estimate.

More »

Table 3 Expand