Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of people in the Renal Risk in Derby cohort.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

The distribution of albuminuria (based on 2 of 3 uACRs) and non-albumin proteinuria (based on 2 of 3 uPCRs) in people with chronic kidney disease stage 3 in the Renal Risk in Derby study.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Scatterplot showing the distribution of uACR and uPCR relative to clinically important threshold values for males (excluding outlier values (ACR over 70 mg/mmol and PCR 150 mg/mmol)).

Explanatory footnote for Figure 2: High values have been excluded (uACR>70 mg/mmol and uPCR>150 mg/mmol) to better illustrate the relationship at lower levels of proteinuria.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Scatterplot showing the distribution of uACR and uPCR relative to clinically important threshold values for females (excluding outlier values (ACR over 70 mg/mmol and PCR 150 mg/mmol)).

Explanatory footnote for Figure 3: High values have been excluded (uACR>70 mg/mmol and uPCR>150 mg/mmol) to better illustrate the relationship at lower levels of proteinuria.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 2.

Associations of having at least A2 albuminuria in at least two of the three urine samples in the Renal Risk in Derby cohort (n with 3 uACR results = 1736).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Associations of having isolated non-albumin proteinuria in the Renal Risk in Derby cohort (based on two of three uACRs and two of three uPCRs).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Bland Altman plot showing the distribution of the average of three uACRs against the difference between one uACR and the average of three (figure restricted to people with average uACR<70 mg/mmol).

Explanatory footnote for Figure 4: Horizontal lines represent the mean difference and the 95% limits of agreement in the whole study population (upper = 9.20, lower = −9.19, mean = 0.0064)

More »

Figure 4 Expand