Figure 1.
Spatial distribution of check-ins and the study area.
(a) The study area in Shanghai. The red lattices represent the study area, and covers two airports, Pudong airport and Hongqiao airport. (b) Spatial distribution of check-ins by activities in the study. One check-in record is geo-referenced as one point according to its location. Different colors of the points denote different activities.
Figure 2.
Criteria for extracting trips.
(a) Two steps for extracting trips from one individual check-in trajectory. A1A2A3A4A5A6… is one individual trajectory sequence. (b) The demonstration of applying the criterions into the anonymous individuals' trajectories. The blue line is the original check-in trajectory. When segmenting this trajectory to trips, we filter the successive check-in pairs that the speed is faster than 431 km/h, such as A3->A4 and A7->A8; or time interval is greater than 12 hours, such as A2->A3 and A9->A10; or the displacement is less than 100 m, such as A4->A5.
Figure 3.
Distribution comparison between distances approximated in different lattice sizes and actual distances.
The 1000's.
Figure 4.
Diurnal temporal distribution of different activities.
a) Transportation. b) Dining. c) Work. d) Entertainment. e) Home. f) Other. The frequency curves of Tr, D, and W each have two peaks that emerge during different periods throughout the day. The first peaks for both Tr and W appear in the period from 7 am to 9 am; at lunchtime, the D reaches its first peak. The W's second peak is earlier than the other two's. The trend lines for both E and H remain at a low level during the daytime and rise after 5 pm. The curve of O is almost same as the W's.
Figure 5.
Spatial distributions of different activities.
In order to make the spatial distribution more clear, the kernel density estimation (KDE) method is adopted. a) Transportation. b) Dining. c) Work. d) Entertainment. e) Home. f) Other. The demands for W, D, E and O are mainly accumulated in the central area, but the demand O is more discrete than the other three. Tr has two special hot spots, which are the Pudong airport and the Hongqiao airport.
Figure 6.
Temporal transition probability matrix of activities.
The horizontal axis is the predecessor demand and time, and the vertical axis is the successor demand and time,
. The transition probability is negligible if the successor time is twelve hours greater than the predecessor time. Obviously, the values for both the dining and entertainment demands during the 7 pm to 9pm from other demands are high. Especially, a high transition probability exists if the successor activity is entertainment at time from 7pm to 9pm on the condition that the predecessor activity is dining at time from 6pm to 7pm.
Figure 7.
Distribution of trip distances.
A) The distance distribution of all trips. B) The distance distribution of three trip patterns. The exponent of pure LMA trips is 0.134 km−1 (R2 = 0.713) whereas the pure LSA's is 0.264 km−1 (R2 = 0.9312). The exponent for hybrid pattern is 0.191 km−1 (R2 = 0.814).
Figure 8.
Comparison between distance distributions of observed and simulated trips.
The Hellinger coefficients is 0.8829, and a peak also exists between 30
Figure 9.
Comparison between spatial distributions of observed and simulated trips.
The KDE method is adopted, and the output cell size is 250,000 square meters. a) The observed successor activities. b) The simulated successor activities. The vast majority part of the observed data can be illustrated by the simulated one, and the Hellinger coefficient is 0.8430.
Figure 10.
Comparison between temporal distributions of observed and simulated trips.
The Hellinger coefficient is 0.9803. In evening time, we can find a one-hour lag exists between two peaks. The lag should be attributed to the one-hour temporal resolution in simulations.
Figure 11.
Comparison between temporal distributions of observed and simulated categories.
a) Transportation, the Hellinger coefficient is 0.976. b) Dining, the Hellinger coefficient is 0.950. c) Work, the Hellinger coefficient is 0.969. d) Entertainment, the Hellinger coefficient is 0.956. e) Home, the Hellinger coefficient is 0.960. f) Other, the Hellinger coefficient is 0.973. Although deviations still exist in the simulated ones, the deviation values are only a few percent. Besides, all simulated results have similar peak shapes to the observed ones.