Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) capture locations and landscape configuration in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) maternity roost uses.

Maximum roost emergence, number of radio-tagged bats, and total roost days for roosts used by an Indiana bat maternity colony in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA, 2009–2010. Data are presented only for roosts with emergence counts.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) roost network maps.

Two-mode network maps of an Indiana bat maternity colony in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA, 2009 (A) and 2010 (B). Node type indicated by color, edge width scaled by the number of connections.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 1.

Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) roost network metrics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 4.

Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) social network maps.

Single-mode social network map of an Indiana bat maternity colony in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA, 2009 (A) and 2010 (B). Map projected from the two-mode network of bats and roosts. Nodes are colored by age class.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 2.

Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) social network metrics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 5.

Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) foraging network maps.

Foraging network maps for of an Indiana bat maternity colony in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA in 2009 (A) and 2010 (B). Connections between nodes (bats) were created when the utilization distribution overlap index for a dyad was >1.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) roosting areas.

Bivariate fixed kernel density roosting area utilization distributions and day-roost locations of an Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) maternity colony in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA in 2009 (A) and 2010 (B). Estimation of the utilization distributions was conducted using the pooled locations from all radio-tagged bats and weighted by the number of uses of individual roosts. Roost size is log scaled by the number of uses to show the relative contribution to the utilization distribution. The 25, 50, 75, and 95% home range contour intervals are shown.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Roost removal impacts on Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) network fragmentation.

Simulated effect of roost removal on the fragmentation of an Indiana bat maternity colony roost network in Pickaway County, Ohio, USA, 2009–2010. Random roost removal was performed 1,000 times per proportion of roosts removed; lines represent mean ± standard error number of networks after node removal.

More »

Figure 7 Expand