Figure 1.
Comparison of unfiltered and filtered M. smegmatis.
Unfiltered M. smegmatis under 40x magnification (A) and plated onto agar (B); M. smegmatis filtered through 5-µm pore filter under 40 x magnification (C) and plated onto agar (D), scale bar applies to both A and C.
Table 1.
Recovery of M. smegmatis after Vortexing and Filtration.
Figure 2.
Histogram of unfiltered, vortexed and filtered M. smegmatis.
Distributions of resorufin fluorescence signals from 384 wells of a 384-well plate contained unfiltered (A), vortexed (B) or filtered (C) M. smegmatis. After the treatment, the bacteria were distributed into the 384-well plates followed by the addition of resazurin, which was converted to resorufin by the living bacteria.
Figure 3.
Agreement analysis of duplicate plates from unfiltered, vortexed and filtered bacteria.
Correlation of two duplicate assay plates tested against LOPAC compounds using unfiltered bacteria (A), vortexed bacteria (B) and filtered bacteria (C).
Figure 4.
Micrograph of unfiltered and filtered M. tuberculosis.
Unfiltered M. tuberculosis under 40x magnification (A) and filtered through 5-µm pore filter under 40x magnification (B), scale bar applies to both A and B.