Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Swelling index of PI and BI in a buffered solution medium (PBS; pH 7.4).

Values expressed as mean ± SD.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

ATR-FTIR spectra of PI (a) and BI (b).

BIM shifted first band to a higher frequency (from 3258 to 3264 cm−1) and widened (arrow).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

DSC curves of PI and BI.

(a) First run; (b) second run.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Representative SEM photomicrographs of Bimatoprost-loaded inserts.

(a) surface; (b) lateral. Bar indicates the thickness of the insert.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

In vitro release profile of BIM from BI.

Values expressed as mean ± SD.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

99mTc-BIM biodistribution profile after eye drops instillation and chitosan inserts implantation.

Values are expressed as ‘mean ± SD’ (n = 5). (*p<0.05 for 8 h vs. 18 h and #p<0.05 for eye drops vs. inserts). Unpaired Student t test.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Effects of administration of BI on IOP.

(a) Glaucomatous groups; (b) non-glaucomatous groups. Treatments initiated after confirmation of the elevated IOP, i.e. after second week. Values expressed as mean ± SD. *p<0.01 vs. untreated. One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Effects of administration of BI on RGC counting.

Quantification of RCG in retinas of (a) glaucomatous groups, compared to control (*p<0.05 vs. control and #p<0.05 vs. untreated glaucoma) and (b) non-glaucomatous groups. Values expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test.

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Figure 9.

Histological analysis of retinal ganglion cells (RGC).

Representative photomicrographs of retinas showing the smaller number of RCG in non-treated and PI-treated glaucomatous rats and the beneficial effect of BIM in this parameter. (a) Non-glaucomatous animals; (b) untreated glaucomatous animals; (c) PI glaucomatous animals; (d) BIM eye drops glaucomatous animals; (e) BI glaucomatous animals.

More »

Figure 9 Expand

Figure 10.

BIM induced neuroprotection in retinas of glaucomatous rats.

Representative photomicrographs of excavation of the optic nerve (arrows). (a) Non-glaucomatous animals; (b) untreated glaucomatous animals; (c) PI glaucomatous animals; (d) BIM eye drops glaucomatous animals; (e) BI glaucomatous animals. Note an exacerbation of the excavation in untreated and PI glaucomatous animals (b and c) when compared with all other groups. This effect is reverted by BIM.

More »

Figure 10 Expand