Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of children in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Literacy composite scores as a function of children’s number of potential familial risk factors.

Risk factors were operationally defined here as: school SES, mother’s level of education, parents’ PA, parents’ PSE and family history of reading difficulty. Error bars denote standard deviations. *signifiactly different (p<.05) to those with 3 or 4 family factors. NB: No child was found to have all 5 familial risk factors.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

a. Mean performance (SD) on the pre-literacy tasks for the low-risk (N = 69) group as a function of time; b. Mean performance (SD) on the pre-literacy tasks for the high-risk group (N = 33) as a function of time.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean performance (SD) on the early literacy tasks as a function of risk group and time.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Family risk factors and child risk factors at T1, T2 and T3 that were significant (stepwise regressions for each factor set) in predicting early Year 1 literacy outcomes.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

a. Hierarchical regression predicting early literacy outcomes from family and child risk factors at T1; b. Hierarchical regression predicting early literacy outcomes from family and child risk factors at T2; c. Hierarchical regression predicting early literacy outcomes from family and child risk factors at T3.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Classification accuracy using within-child and family risk factors.

More »

Table 6 Expand