Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of the laboratory-scale biofilter.

Each biofilter comprised a central cylinder with an inner diameter of 15(i.e. above the bottom cap), a stainless steel screen (1 cm-mesh size) was inserted as a support for the coal bed. A thermocouple was inserted through the side of the cylinder for monitoring the temperature within the centre of the packing. The biofilter temperature was maintained by continuously circulating heated water through a tube coiled around the central component of the biofilter. The temperature of the heating water reservoir was adjusted so that the temperature within the biofilter was 30°C.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table I.

Gas flow rates, corresponding empty bed residence times (EBRT) and equivalent methane inlet loads used during biofilter experiments.

More »

Table I Expand

Table II.

Parameters used to quantify biofilter performance.

More »

Table II Expand

Figure 2.

Effect of methane inlet load on the methane elimination capacity (A); and on the methane removal efficiency (B).

Biofilters were operated at 1% methane (v/v) in humidified air; 30°C; non-sterilised coal as packing material. Each data point is the mean of eight measurements during two weeks of steady state operation, with error bars representing the standard deviation.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Carbon dioxide production rate (PCO2) in biofilter 1 (▪) and biofilter 2 (▴).

Biofilters were operated at 1% methane (v/v) in humidified air; 30°C; non-sterilized coal as packing material. Biofilter 1 was inoculated with M. sporium. Each data point is the mean of eight measurements during two weeks of steady state operation, with error bars representing the standard deviation.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table III.

Carbon mass balances and estimated carbon accumulation rates (CACC) in the biofilters at varying methane inlet loads (IL).

More »

Table III Expand

Figure 4.

Rarefaction curve.

Rarefaction curve of unique sequences at 0.03 sequence identity cut-off for the 16S rRNA gene of the microbial communities of three replicates for biofilter 1 and 2.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table IV.

Mean abundance of OTUs in biofilter 1 and 2 and their taxonomic assignment.

More »

Table IV Expand

Table V.

Comparison of biofilter performance in the present work with biofiltration results from other studies at similar empty bed residence times (EBTR).

More »

Table V Expand