Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Phenotypes and genetic testing of the eight patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Variant analysis and prioritization workflow.

Summary of our variant evaluation process for identifying candidate mutations

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of MPS data for the eight patients.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

L1CAM splice site mutation in Patient 1.

(A) IGV snapshot of c.3458-1G>A variant in the L1CAM gene (Chr X:153129005, hg19). (B) Sanger sequencing confirmation of c.3458-1G>A variant (NM_000425.3) (C) Partial cDNA sequence showing the mutant allele with the 5 bp deletion.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

ATRX p.R2386X mutation in Patient 2.

(A) IGV snapshot of c.7156C>T variant in ATRX (Chr X:76776310, hg19). (B) Sanger sequencing confirmation of c.7156C>T (p.R2386X, NM_00489.3) in Patient 2. (C) Sanger sequencing showing heterozygous c.7156C>T variant in the mother.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

USP9X splice site mutation in Patient 3.

(A) IGV snapshot of c.1986-1G>T variant in USP9X (Chr X:41025124, hg19). (B) Sanger sequencing confirmation of c.1986-1G>T variant (NM_001039590.2) in Patient 3. (C) Partial cDNA sequence showing expression of both the wild type and low level mutant allele with the 13 bp deletion. (D) Partial cDNA sequence of control patient. (E) Partial genomic DNA sequence of exon 15 (uppercase, blue) and intron 14 (lowercase, red) of USP9X gene showing the c.1986-1G>T variant (arrow) and the 13 bp deletion (r.1986_1998delATTTTTATTGAAG) which is underlined.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 3.

Assessed candidate variants found in patients 4–8.

More »

Table 3 Expand