Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Parallel workflow for the IGF1 assay.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Mass spectra from a normal individual (A) and an individual with a single nucleotide polymorphism (B). m/z values refer to the average mass [M+H]+.

A) Native IGF1 was detected (observed 7649.99 m/z, theoretical 7649.71) along with a putative glycosylated variant (labeled with *; observed 8346.90 m/z, theoretical unknown). B) Both IGF1 (observed 7649.75 m/z, theoretical 7649.71) and IGF1 A67T (observed 7679.75 m/z, theoretical 7679.71) were detected as well as their respective putative glycosylated variants (observed 8349.35 m/z, theoretical unknown and observed 8379.15 m/z, theoretical unknown).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

An example of a standard curve for the IGF1 MSIA.

Plotted are the peak area ratios of IGF1/LR3-IGF1 over the standards concentrations. Solid line: linear fit with R2 = 0.99, SEE = 0.69. Dotted lines: 95% prediction intervals. The average r2 for the twelve standard curves was 0.98 and the range was 0.97–0.99.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Intra-and inter-assay precision.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Assay linearity.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Spiking recovery.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 3.

Histogram of IGF1 concentrations determined by MSIA for 1054 EDTA treated human plasma samples.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

IGF1 methods comparison.

A) Scatter plot. B) Difference plot.

More »

Figure 4 Expand