Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Graphical depictions of the calculations.

(A) Participants made estimations about the actual size of each particular balloon and how big it could become before popping. These estimations provide a measure of both real-world perception and the subjective point of risk (i.e., popping for balloons) for each participant. (B) We calculated the slope changes based upon the estimations reported by each participant. The actual balloons varied in size (either 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 inches wide), and we plotted these actual sizes against the estimated sizes reported by the participant. Note that actual sizes should show a linear increase of 1 if the participant reported actual sizes with perfect accuracy, whereas additional size estimates should show a linear decrease of -1 if the participant reported additional sizes with perfect accuracy.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for key measures.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlations between self-report surveys for subjective invulnerability, optimism bias, and sensation seeking.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Correlations between measures of risk-taking and responses from the balloon estimation task.

More »

Table 3 Expand