Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of models using log-transformed counts of the explanatory variables.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Estimates of the regression coefficient for target species.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Expected abundance of Greater Glider and Mountain Brushtail Possum.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 1.

Observed and expected abundance of Greater Glider and Mountain Brushtail Possum.

Observed and expected abundance, from the model with transformed counts of hollow-bearing trees as the explanatory variable, for all four datasets. Only one observation was greater than 7 animals, and this is indicated as an abundance of 11 Mountain Brushtail Possums in Dataset 1.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Estimated regression coefficients.

Estimated regression coefficients (with standard errors) in the fitted relationship between abundance of three species of marsupial and abundance of hollow-bearing trees, plotted over time, together with the associated mean numbers per site of hollow-bearing trees, and of each species of arboreal marsupial.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of negative binomial models for species richness.

More »

Table 4 Expand