Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Imaging parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

For the representative intervertebral disc, regions of interest (ROIs) evaluation on the sagittal T2WI, an ellipse ROI was selected for the nucleus pulposus (NP).

Suitable ROIs for both the anterior and posterior annulus fibrosus (AF) were selected. Then these ROIs in T2WI were copied to the T2 map and T2 colored-map. T2 values were measured.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Degeneration grade according to Pfirrmann scale, sex, and disc level of the cervical intervertebral discs of healthy young adults analyzed in study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Pfirrmann grade.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

Box plots of T2 value of both nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) according to the anatomic level of each disc.

The boxes represent the median and the interquartile range, with the vertical lines showing the range. *P<0.000.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Box plots of T2 value of nucleus pulposus (NP) by sex according to the anatomic level of each disc.

White: Male; Black: Female. The boxes represent the median and the interquartile range, with the vertical lines showing the range.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 4.

T2 values of male and female on nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus according to the anatomic level of each disc expressed as median and interquartile range.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 4.

Box plots of T2 value of nucleus pulposus (NP) according to the grade of Pfirrmann.

The boxes represent the median and the interquartile range, with the vertical lines showing the range. Three case with Pfirrmann grade IV (T2 value = 36.72) was excluded. *P<0.000.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 5.

T2 values for discs at different Pfirrmann grades.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 5.

Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve between each grade in the NP and cut-off value.

The most accurate point was obtained from the ROC curve as the cut-off value. A. The T2 cut-off value between grades I and II was found to be 62.03 ms, sensitivity 83.80%, specificity 64.40%, and Area Under curve (AUC) 0.785, separately. B. The values between grades II and III were 54.60 ms, 66.80%, 71.18%, and 0.722, separately.

More »

Figure 5 Expand