Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Protein isotopic values of food groups and relative dietary intakes for a simulated consumer.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Model output for simulated data (credible intervals on the left and probability distributions on the right).

Boxes represent a 68% credible interval (corresponding to the 16th and 84th percentiles) while the whiskers represent a 95% credible interval (corresponding to the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles). The horizontal continuous line represents the estimated mean while the horizontal dashed line represents the estimated median (50th percentile). Star symbols represent the dietary intake amounts used to simulate data.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Average (10 pigs) isotopic values and associated uncertainties of dietary proxies.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Main food groups with total and carbon-only normalized dry weight composition of macronutrients.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Diet-to-tissue offset and weight contribution of the different food fractions towards a dietary proxy signal.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Fraction isotopic values for the different food groups.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 2.

Model output using data from Hare et [6] (credible intervals on the left and probability distributions on the right) for proposed dietary scenarios (a), (b), and (c).

Boxes represent a 68% credible interval (corresponding to the 16th and 84th percentiles) while the whiskers represent a 95% credible interval (corresponding to the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles). The horizontal dashed line represents the estimated mean while the horizontal discontinuous line represents the estimated median (50th percentile). Star symbols represent the actual dietary intake amounts of Corn and Gluten.

More »

Figure 2 Expand