Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and CYP2B6*6 and ABCB1 (c.4046A>G) genotypes of the study participants (n = 99).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Goodness of Fit.

Individual predicted EFV concentrations (IPRED) versus observed concentrations, by CYP2B6*6 genotype (B66).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

The individually weighted residuals (WRES) are plotted vs. time.

The dashed line is the zero reference line while the solid line is a smooth nonparametric regression line. The plot demonstrates a good fit of all time point concentration data by the model.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of significant factors in the covariate analysis; forward inclusion (α = 0.05) followed by backward elimination (α = 0.01).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Final model pharmacokinetic parameters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 3.

Distribution of estimated patient AUC values by CYP2B6 genotype.

CYP2B6*1/*1, CYP2B6 *1/*6, and CYP2B6 *6/*6. Dotted line = the mean AUC value in the product label.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 4.

Area under the curve (AUC) NONMEM estimate values for ABCB1 c. 4046A>G and or CYP2B6* 6 genotypes.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Simulation based AUC for 300

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

HIV viral loads at baseline and day 84 of treatment and AUC of study participants who failed to attain viral suppression to below detection by day 84.

More »

Table 6 Expand