Table 1.
Details on NGS (FLX/454 and Illumina) and Sanger sequencing datasets used for developing comprehensive chickpea transcriptome assembly (CaTA v2).
Table 2.
Comparative analysis of chickpea transcriptome assemblies.
Figure 1.
Functional categorization of chickpea Transcript Assembly Contigs (TACs) of the CaTA v2.
Chickpea TACs representing the distribution of genes based on their annotations to terms in the GO were categorized hierarchically according to three principal gene ontologies, viz. biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components. The number of TACs representing each subcategory is shown in Y-axis.
Figure 2.
Enzyme classification of chickpea Transcript Assembly Contigs (TACs) among the six enzyme classes.
The graph displays the proportion of genes belonging to each enzyme class.
Figure 3.
Distribution of chickpea transcripts in different transcription factor (TF) families.
Based on conserved domain annotation, Transcript Assembly Contigs (TACs) showing significant annotation to transcription factors were classified.
Table 3.
Mapping of chickpea TACs onto Medicago genome.
Figure 4.
A sample view of chickpea TACs, markers and candidate ISR markers onto Medicago Genome sequence.
This image is from Legume Information System (LIS) GBrowse viewer at http://medtr.comparative-legumes.org/gb2/gbrowse/3.5.1/, shows 1 Mb (17,648,842.18,648,841 of Medicago, chromosome Mt1). Red: There was at least one additional reported CaTA v2 alignment Green: There were no other reported alignments.
Table 4.
Multiple mapping of CaTA v2 onto Medicago genome.
Table 5.
Identification of simple sequence repeats: their distribution and primer design for chickpea genetics and breeding applications.
Table 6.
Correspondences of chickpea genic molecular markers to Medicago.
Table 7.
Distribution of ISRs on chickpea linkage groups.
Table 8.
Distribution ISRs on chickpea contigs.