Table 1.
Data extraction items of included studies.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of article screening and selection process.
Figure 2.
Number of included systematic reviews/Meta-analyses per year of publication.
Table 2.
Characteristics of included systematic reviews/meta-analyses.
Figure 3.
Changing pattern of quality assessment in diagnostic systematic reviews/Meta-analyses.
Table 3.
The results of quality assessment of reporting (n = 312).
Figure 4.
Comparison of the quality of reporting of included systematic reviews/Meta-analyses based on the publication time.
Figure 5.
Comparison of the quality of reporting of included systematic reviews/Meta-analyses based on the affiliations.
Figure 6.
Comparison of the quality of reporting of included systematic reviews/Meta-analyses based on the funding sources.
Figure 7.
Comparison of the quality of reporting of included systematic reviews/Meta-analyses from CSCD vs non CSCD.
Figure 8.
Comparison of the quality of reporting of included systematic reviews/Meta-analyses from SCI vs non SCI.