Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Study area location in Alberta, Canada.

Grizzly bear hair samples were collected in each bear management unit during a single summer (Yellowhead – 2004; Clearwater – 2005; Livingstone – 2006; Castle – 2007; Grande Cache – 2008).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Variables used to predict HCC levels in grizzly bears.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

HCC kernel density estimation validation results by bear management unit (BMU).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

Variable importance metrics for male and female HCC random forest models.

Variable importance for the male (A) total model, (B) outside parks and protected areas model, and (C) inside parks and protected areas model, as well as the female (D) total model, (E) outside parks and protected areas model, and (F) inside parks and protected areas model. Variable importance plots on the left of each panel (%IncMSE) represent the accuracy of random forest model predictions based on regression tree splits made using each variable. Plots on the right of each panel (IncNodePurity) indicate how often each variable was used as a split in regression trees aggregated through the random forest. For example, in panels A & D the proportion parks and protected areas was selected often as a tree split in the random forest and had a high predictive HCC value accuracy.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean values of the 10 most influential variables in the total random models associated with lower, mid, and upper quartiles of the predicted HCC levels in male and female grizzly bears.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 3.

Geographic distribution of the predicted HCC levels from gender-specific total random forest models.

Predicted HCC values for (A) male and (B) female grizzly bears. Parks and protected areas are shown in red. Regions of non-habitat (e.g., rock and ice) are shown in grey.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Frequency distributions of predicted HCC values associated with conservation management units and habitat states.

Percent spatial coverage of predicted HCC values associated with (A – males; C – females) parks and protected areas, core conservation areas, and secondary conservation areas, as well as (B – males, D – females) secure, sink, and non-critical habitat states.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 4.

Percent area of the bear management units (BMU) and study area classified as low, moderate, and high HCC based on the geographic distribution of predicted male and female HCC values.

More »

Table 4 Expand