Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Focus group participant characteristics

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Checklist for REACH scale dominant side affected.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Checklist for REACH scale non-dominant-side affected.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Algorithm for REACH scale dominant side affected.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Algorithm for REACH scale non-dominant side affected.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 2.

Participant characteristics (N = 96 except for activity counts where N = 68).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 5.

Plot of rater agreement.

The plot shows the REACH scores of Rater 1 versus Rater 2 for each participant. The plot includes a horizontal jitter to ensure visibility of data points at identical locations.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Scatterplots of REACH scale scores with external measures of upper extremity (UE) use, function and impairment.

Plots A, B show relationship between REACH scores and measures of UE use. Plots C, D show relationship between REACH scores and measures of UE function. Plots E, F show relationship between REACH scores and measures of UE impairment. The plots include a horizontal jitter to ensure visibility of data points at identical locations.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 3.

Correlations between REACH scores and established external measures.

More »

Table 3 Expand