Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Geodesic sensor net layout.

Electrode sites are numbered. Red clusters are regions of interest included in analyses. LFP = left frontal-polar, FPM = frontal-polar medial, RFP = right frontal-polar, LFI = left frontal inferior, LFS = left frontal superior, FM = frontal medial, RFS = right frontal superior, RFI = right frontal inferior, LCI = left central inferior, LCS = left central superior, CM = central medial, RCS = right central superior, RCI = right central inferior, LPI = left parietal inferior, LPS = left parietal superior, PM = parietal medial, RPS = right parietal superior, RPI = right parietal inferior.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

A) Mean amplitudes from the test phase depicting recognition-related brain activation for “recollected” and “familiar” old faces and correctly rejected new faces for in-group and out-group faces. Vertical lines highlight the time segment from 600 to 900 ms used for statistical analysis of the parietal old/new effect. See Figure 1 for abbreviations of regions of interest and their locations. B) Voltage maps of ERP difference waves between “recollected” and “familiar” conditions showing the parietal old/new effect at 600-900 ms for in-group and out-group faces. Spherical spline interpolation was used.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Mean amplitudes from the first run of the study phase depicting encoding-related brain activation (Dms) for subsequently “recollected,” “familiar,” and forgotten in-group and out-group faces for subjects with and without a behavioral in-group memory advantage.

See Figure 1 for abbreviations of regions of interest and their locations.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Mean amplitudes from the test phase depicting recognition-related brain activation for “recollected” and “familiar” old faces and correctly rejected new in-group and out-group faces for subjects with and without a behavioral in-group memory advantage.

Vertical lines highlight the time segment from 300 to 500 ms used for statistical analysis of the FN400 old/new effect. See Figure 1 for abbreviations of regions of interest and their locations.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Voltage maps of ERP difference waves between “recollected” and “familiar” conditions comparing the FN400 at 300-500 ms and the parietal old/new effect at 600-900 ms for in-group and out-group faces in subjects with and without a behavioral in-group memory advantage.

Spherical spline interpolation was used.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Table 1.

Performance data comparing in-group and out-group faces.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Performance data separately for subjects with and without an in-group memory advantage.

More »

Table 2 Expand