Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of the selection of studies included in the review.

[RCT=randomized controlled trial; FCBC= fluoride-containing bone cement; ALBC=antibiotic-loaded bone cement].

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

The RRs and 95% CIs for the incidence of superficial infection among patients treated with vs. without antibiotic bone cement.

(ALBC vs. PBC and ALBC vs. SA) [ALBC: antibiotic-loaded bone cement; PBC: plain bone cement; SA: systemic antibiotic].

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

The RRs and 95% CIs for the incidence of deep infection among patients treated with vs. without antibiotic bone cement.

(ALBC vs. PBC and ALBC vs. SA) [ALBC: antibiotic-loaded bone cement; PBC: plain bone cement; SA: systemic antibiotic].

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

The RRs and 95% CIs for the incidence of deep infection among patients treated with vs. without antibiotic bone cement.

(Hip, Knee, Hip and Knee).

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

The RRs and 95% CIs for the incidence of deep infection among patients treated with vs. without antibiotic bone cement.

(Gentamicin and Cefuroxime).

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Funnel plot to assess publication.

Funnel plot to assess publication for the most frequently reported outcome-the deep infection rate. (ALBC vs. PBC and ALBC vs. SA) [ALBC: antibiotic-loaded bone cement; PBC: plain bone cement; SA: systemic antibiotic].

More »

Figure 6 Expand