Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

A schematic model of SAg of S. aureus interaction with TCR and MHC class II molecules of an infected H. sapiens.

Here, one can find the difference between antigen and SAg binding site on TCR.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

agr and sar loci from S. aureus, adapted from [140].

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Gene regulatory network involving sarA family, agr and rot (transcriptional regulators) in SAg expression regulatory pathway of the S. aureus [27], [31].

Sharp arrow head indicates activation and blocked arrow head shows inhibition.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

TCR signaling pathway of H. sapiens.

SEB refers to Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B. Sharp arrow head indicates activation and blocked arrow shows inhibition.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Diagram showing the studied biochemical pathways upon perturbed/unperturbed conditions, along with different conflicting objective functions.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Displaying the concept behind the construction of integrated pathway system that includes SAg expression regulatory pathway of S. aureus and TCR signaling pathway of an infected host (H. sapiens).

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Table 1.

Names of signaling molecules present in TCR signaling pathway of H. sapiens and the respective c-values for the regulators to form these signaling molecules in unperturbed/perturbed conditions in different cases as mentioned in Fig. 5.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 7.

Graph shows optimization of two conflicting objective functions in an integrated pathway system of SAg expression regulatory pathway of S. aureus and TCR signaling pathway of an infected host (H. sapiens).

Here, is maximized, while is minimized.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Comparing -values [0–1] of the molecules present in TCR signaling pathway of H. sapiens in three cases: (1) in an unperturbed TCR signaling pathway, (2) in a perturbed one and (3) after applying conflicting objective function optimization (case 4) on the perturbed TCR signaling pathway.

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Table 2.

Effects on some of the TCR signaling molecules upon perturbing the concentrations of ZAP70, LCK and FYN for unperturbed and perturbed TCR signaling pathways of H. sapiens.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of some of the computed c-values for given signaling molecules with the existing experimental evidences, for biological validation purpose.

More »

Table 3 Expand