Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Dynamic of climate factors in the period 1911–2000.

The variations of climatic variables were derived from CRU_TS 2.1 data. (a): mean annual temperature (MAT), (b): biological temperature (BT), (c): mean annual precipitation (MAP).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Spatial distribution of global natural vegetaiton biomes in the period 1911–2000.

(a): T1 period (1911–1940), (b): T2 period (1941–1970), (c): T3 period (1971–2000). The different colors represent the different ecosystems, tundra & alpine steppe (12.85%), cold desert (1.56%), warm desert (13.93%), semi-desert (5.96%), savanna (17.66%), steppe (3.29%), temperate humid grassland (5.86%) and Forest (39.65%) in T3 period.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 1.

Areas of terrestrial ecosystems at continental levels in 1911–2000.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 3.

Map showing the geographical distribution of detailed terrestrial NPP study sites.

The dataset are obtained from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Distributed Active Archive Center database. • = grassland sites included in the present analysis; ▴ = NPP study sites forests (tropical forest, temperate forest and boreal forest), ★ and + = multi biomes – EDMI (B and C) data [63]. These data, and further information about the study sites, are publicly available at www.daac.ornl.gov/NPP/.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Comparison of NPP value simulated by synthetic model and observed data (r = 0.9262, P<0.001).

The observed data are collected from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). These data, and further information about the study sites, are publicly available at www.daac.ornl.gov/NPP/.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of published values of present terrestrial net primary productivity (NPPT) and our research.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

NPP of terrestrial ecosystems at continental levels in 1911-2000.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 5.

Variations of terrestrial ecosystems NPP in climatic zones in the period 1911–2000.

(a): Tropical zone, (b): North frigid zone, (c): North temperate zone, (d): South temperate zone. South frigid zone was not involved in this research. TAS: tundra & alpine steppe; CD: Cold desert; SD: Semi-desert; SP: Steppe; THG: Temperate humid grassland; WD: warm desert; SV: savanna; TF: Tempearte forest; STF: Subtropical forest; TRF: Tropical forest.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Proportion of different correlations between global NPP and MAP, MAT and BT.

ESNC is extremely significant negative correlation; SNC is significant negative correlation; NCNS is negative correlation but none significant; PCNS is positive correlation but none significant; SPC is significant positive correlation; ESPC is extremely significant positive correlation.

More »

Figure 6 Expand