Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic data for the 694 ADNI participants, shown across categories of clinical status.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

ADNI cognitive instruments used in this study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

The concept of a probabilistic hypercube is illustrated.

The probability hypercube can be interpreted as a geometrical representation of the output of a set of generative classifiers, each one estimated with different types of data. The set of AD-PS scores corresponding to a given individual define a position inside a unit hypercube. The position inside the hypercube for three individuals is illustrated.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

RLR classifier performances across different types of information and cognitive groups.

Consistent with previous reports, grey matter (GM) tissue was more informative than white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Interestingly, this difference decreases when a group with less severe cognitive decline is compared with the cognitively normal (CN) group.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

The GM, WM and CSF discriminative maps produced by logistic regression with sparsity regularization are overlaid on the study customized template generated by DARTEL.

In each case, nine coronal slices (−82, −68, −52, −38, −22, −8, 8, 22, 38) are shown (neurological convention) in the first, second, and third rows, respectively. The blue areas are associated with AD classification, while the red ones are associated with CN classification.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 3.

Median values of classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity across cognitive groups are presented.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Median AD-PS scores by type of information, SPARE-AD index and total hippocampal volume at baseline are presented.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Results from proportional hazards regression to assess associations with the distribution of times until conversion to AD.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Median values of AD-PS scores, SPARE-AD index and total hippocampal volume were estimated across cognitive status categories for ADNI participants, based on age (<75 yrs., vs. ≥75 yrs.).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Median values of AD-PS scores, SPARE-AD index and total hippocampal volume were estimated across clinical groups by functional status (FAQ≤2 v. >2).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Figure 4.

Two-dimensional probabilistic hypercube views of ADNI data showing AD-PS grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) scores for 188 cognitively normal (CN – blue stars) and 171 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients (red circles).

They tended to cluster in different corners, as expected.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Table 8.

Summary of classification reports of CN versus AD subjects based on structural MRI data from different groups.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Summary of classification reports of ncMCI versus cMCI subjects based on structural MRI data from different groups.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Results related to detection of differences between ncMCI from cMCI ADNI participants based on statistical testing and imaging data.

More »

Table 10 Expand