Figure 1.
Neural mass model of Jansen and Rit with excitatory interneurons (EIN), pyramidal cells (PC) as well as inhibitory interneurons (IIN).
Figure 2.
Neural mass model for a cortical source with excitatory interneurons (EIN) in layer 4, superficial pyramidal cells (sPC) in layers 2/3, deep pyramidal cells (dPC) in layers 5/6, as well as two inhibitory interneuron populations (sIIN, dIIN).
Figure 3.
A simple sketch to show the releasing and recycling process of neural vesicles.
We classify the vesicles as belonging to one of two states. Neural vesicles, which dock at the presynaptic membrane, are in readily releasable state (RR). Neural vesicles, which are under endocytosis and recycling processes are in not-readily releasable state (NRR).
Table 1.
Priors of parameters.
Figure 4.
Field mapping of the observed MEG over the right hemisphere.
During the development of the N100m peak, the pattern clearly suggests a single dipole located in the right superior middle temporal lobe near Heschl’s gyrus.
Figure 5.
Habituation of the N100m source.
The amplitudes are normalized to the responses to the first stimulus.
Figure 6.
Observed and simulated (using LCCM) time courses of dipole activities.
Figure 7.
Simulated data to demonstrate that the N100m peak recovers completely during the 10 s stimulus free time.
Figure 8.
Model comparisons for LCCM and JRM.
(a) Goodness of fit. (b) Log Bayes factors on individual subject level. (c) Log model evidences at group level (sum over all subjects).
Table 2.
Estimated “uncertain“ connections. Non-zero connections are marked with “X”.
Table 3.
Synaptic efficacies at the time point of the fifth stimulus (when the habituation is usually converged, the synaptic efficacies at the 2nd, 3th, 4th and 5th stimulus are listed in Table S2).
Figure 9.
Simulated data using variable inter-stimuli interval (ISI) (500 ms, 1000 ms, and 1500 ms).