Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Number of eyes evaluated at each examination point.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Demographic data and preoperative characteristics of the study participants.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

Time dependent changes in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) (mean ± SD) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond LASIK (femto-LASIK).

*Significantly higher than the preoperative level (SMILE; P<0.05). Significantly higher than the preoperative level (femto-LASIK; P<0.05).Significantly different between groups (P<0.05).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 3.

Preoperative and postoperative clinical parameters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

Time dependent changes in the tear breakup time (TBUT) scores (mean ± SD, s) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond LASIK (femto-LASIK).

*Significantly shorter than the preoperative level (SMILE; P<0.05).Significantly shorter than the preoperative level (femto-LASIK; P<0.05).Significantly different between groups (P<0.05).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Time dependent changes in the Schirmer test results (mean ± SD, mm) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond LASIK (femto-LASIK).

*Significantly shorter than the preoperative level (SMILE; P<0.05). Significantly shorter than the preoperative level (femto-LASIK; P<0.05).

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Time dependent changes in the mean central corneal sensations (mean ± SD, mm) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond LASIK (femto-LASIK).

*Significantly lower than the preoperative level (SMILE; P<0.05). Significantly lower than the preoperative level (femto-LASIK; P<0.05).Significantly different between groups (P<0.05).

More »

Figure 4 Expand