Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Mean values of temperature and precipitation of the study area (2004∼2011).

Vertical bars indicate standard errors of means (n = 8).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Daily courses of soil temperature at different measuring depths at the adjacent natural conditions (data of Jun-21 and 22).

T0, T5, T10, T20, T30 and T40 represent temperature measured at 0, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40-delay of daily highest temperature from T0, and values are 60, 240, 420, 740 and 960 sec minutes for a, b, c, d and e, respectively.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Dependence of the time-delay of daily highest temperature from T0 (mean ± SE), values of Q10, R2 and RSS on the depth of soil temperature measuring point.

Sub-Fig (A), (B), (C) and (D) represent time-delay from T0, values of Q10, R2 and RSS, respectively. Q10: the temperature sensitivity of RS; RSS: residual sum of squares of the exponential function.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Mean values of temperature and soil moisture under different water addition regimes without FOM treatments.

Sub-Fig (A) and (B) represent temperature and soil moisture, respectively. Vertical bars indicate standard errors of means (n = 3). FOM: fresh organic matter; F0: no FOM input; P0, P1, P2: no added water, 50% and 100% increase in water addition, respectively.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Daily means of soil respiration (mean ± SE) under different treatments.

Sub-Fig (A), (B) and (C) represent soil respiration rate under P0, P1 and P2 treatments, respectively. Vertical bars indicate standard errors of means (n = 3). F1 and F2: 5% and 10% increase in soil organic carbon. Other abbreviations are same as Figure 4.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Mean values (mean ± SE) of soil respiration under different treatments and at the natural condition site in total study period.

Sub-Fig (A) and (B) represent soil respiration under different treatments and natural site, respectively. Vertical bars indicate standard errors of means (n = 3). Bars with different lowercase letters are significantly different from each other at p<0.05. Abbreviations are same as Figure 5.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Fresh organic matter and water addition induced change percentages in soil respiration rate (mean ± SE).

Sub-Fig (A) and (B) represent fresh organic matter and water addition induced change percentages, respectively. Vertical bars indicate standard errors of means (n = 3). * represent significant different compared with controls at P<0.01. Other abbreviations are same as Figure 4.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Table 1.

Results (F-Values) of ANOVA with fresh organic matter (FOM) and water addition, and their interactions on soil respiration.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 8.

Relationship between soil respiration (mean ± SE) and soil temperature under different FOM and water addition treatments.

An exponential was used to describe the relationship. Vertical bars indicate standard errors of means (n = 3). Inserts represent the residuals from the equation. Other abbreviations are same as Figure 4.

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Table 2.

Fitted relationships of soil respiration (µmol m–2 s–1) with soil moisture (at 10 cm soil depth) (W, %) in all treatments.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Fitted relationships of soil respiration (µmol m–2 s–1) with soil moisture (at 10 soil depth) (W, %) and soil temperature (T, at soil surface, °C).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Soil C input–emission balanced with different FOM and water addition treatments during study period. Data are in contrast to the controls (F0P0).

More »

Table 4 Expand