Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Typical actin-network (a) form-finding model (b) scanning electron micrograph.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Generation of a filament and cross-linked network (a) a prescribed square domain (b) the first actin filament placed (c) actin filaments reaching the specified relative density (d) actin filaments are divided into segments by nodes (e) the network of actin filaments connected by cross-linkers (i.e., actin-cross-linking proteins) before form-finding analysis (f) the network of actin filaments connected by cross-linkers after form-finding analysis.

*d and e show magnifications of the square region marked by the black dashed line in c.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Schematic diagram of Hooke’s law for plane stress state.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Typical model and impact of number of simulations (actin filament relative density: 0.2%, size: 10μm×10μm, Actin filament length: 5μm±2μm, segment length 0.3μm±0.06μm, and maximum cross-linker length: 0.3μm) (a) layout of a selected sample (b) histogram of elastic moduli for 100 samples: E¯=4.38kPa, std(E)=0.47kPa (c) histogram of elastic moduli for 1000 samples: E¯=4.41kPa, std(E)=0.52kPa.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Typical model and response on 10μm×10μm domain (100 samples, actin filament relative density: 0.15%, actin filament length: 5μm±2μm, segment length 0.3μm±0.06μm, and maximum cross-linker length: 0.3 μm) (a) layout of a selected sample (10μm×10μm) (b) histogram of elastic moduli, E¯=3.11kPa, std(E)=0.40kPa.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Typical model and response on 20μm×20μm domain (100 samples, actin filament relative density: 0.15%, actin filament length: 5μm±2μm, segment length 0.3μm±0.06μm, and maximum cross-linker length: 0.3 μm) (a) layout of a selected sample (20μm×20μm) (b) histogram of elastic moduli, E¯=3.09kPa, std(E)=0.24kPa.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Initial layout and orientation of filament segments (a) initial layout of a selected sample (b) histogram of angles between filament segments and horizontal axis at the initial state.

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Deformed shape and orientation at 50% tensile strain (a) layout of a selected sample at 50% extension (b) histogram of angles between filament segments and horizontal axis.

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Figure 9.

Deformed shape and orientation at 100% tensile strain (a) layout of a selected sample at 100% extension (b) histogram of angles between filament segments and horizontal axis.

More »

Figure 9 Expand

Figure 10.

Layouts of selected samples with different actin filament relative densities.

(a) 0.15% (b) 0.20% (c) 0.25% (d) 0.30%.

More »

Figure 10 Expand

Figure 11.

Impact of filament relative density on stiffness (a) filament relative density of 0.15%, E¯=3.11kPa, std(E)=0.40kPa; (b) filament relative density of 0.20%, E¯ = 4.38kPa, std(E) = 0.47kPa; (c) filament relative density of 0.25%, E¯ = 5.69kPa, std(E) = 0.66kPa; (d) filament relative density of 0.30%, E¯ = 6.83kPa, std(E) = 0.67kPa. E¯and std(E) denote sample mean and standard deviation of elastic modulus E, respectively.

More »

Figure 11 Expand

Figure 12.

Variation of average stiffness of networks with relative density of actin filaments.

More »

Figure 12 Expand

Figure 13.

Layouts of selected samples having different lengths of actin filaments (a) 0.6±0.12μm (b) 2.4±0.48μm (c) 4.2±0.84μm (d) 6±1.2μm.

More »

Figure 13 Expand

Figure 14.

Impact of average actin filament length (L) on stiffness (filament relative density of 0.2%) (a) actin filament length L = 0.6±0.12μm, E¯ = 2.08kPa, std(E) = 0.19kPa; (b) L = 2.4±0.48μm, E¯ = 3.00kPa, std(E) = 0.32kPa; (c) L = 4.2±0.84μm, E¯ = 3.50kPa, std(E) = 0.39kPa; (d) L = 6.0±1.2μm, E¯ = 3.85kPa, std(E) = 0.49kPa.

More »

Figure 14 Expand

Figure 15.

Variation of network stiffness as a function of average filament length.

More »

Figure 15 Expand

Figure 16.

Layouts of selected samples having (a) 20%, (b) 40%, (c) 60%, (d) 80%, and (e) 100% cross-linkers.

To highlight the cross-linkers, they are marked by blue dashed lines and actin filaments are in green.

More »

Figure 16 Expand

Figure 17.

Impact of cross-linker density (f) on stiffness (filament relative density of 0.2): (a) cross-linker density f = 20%, E¯ = 1.35 kPa, std(E) = 0.27kPa; (b) f = 40%, E¯ = 2.39kPa, std(E) = 0.35kPa; (c) f = 60%, E¯ = 3.15 kPa, std(E) = 0.42kPa; (d) f = 80%, E¯ = 3.77kPa, std(E) = 0.46kPa.

More »

Figure 17 Expand

Figure 18.

Variation of network stiffness with percentage of cross-linkers.

More »

Figure 18 Expand

Figure 19.

Histogram of actin filament energy fraction that is axial strain energy (10μm×10μm, actin filament relative density 0.15%, actin filament length 5μm±2μm, segment length 0.3±0.06μm, and maximum cross-linker length: 0.3μm).

More »

Figure 19 Expand