Figure 1.
Structures of the iboga alkaloid ibogamine parent skeleton and ibogaine, noribogaine, and 18-MC.
Figure 2.
Effect of ibogaine, noribogaine, and 18-MC on [35S]GTPγS binding in HEK 293-mMOR cells compared with full agonist DAMGO and partial agonist buprenorphine (BUP) (Reith lab).
Cell suspension aliquots were incubated with indicated drug for 15 min and subsequently with an additional concentration of 0.08 nM of [35S]GTPγS at 30°C. Data are expressed as % of maximal stimulation by 10 µM DAMGO and presented as mean ± SEM (vertical bar) for 3 - 4 independent experiments assayed in triplicate.
Figure 3.
Antagonism of DAMGO (100 nM)-induced [35S]GTPγS binding in HEK 293-mMOR cells by ibogaine, noribogaine, and 18-MC (Reith lab).
Degree of stimulation by drug alone, i.e.,100 nM DAMGO, 100 µM noribogaine (NOR), 100 µM 18-MC, or 100 µM ibogaine (IBO) is indicated by symbols on the left. The colored curves represent the effect of increasing the concentrations of ibogaine, noribogaine, or 18-MC co-incubated with 100 nM DAMGO. Otherwise as in Figure 2.
Figure 4.
Rightward shift in morphine curves for stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding in HEK 293-mMOR cells by ibogaine (100 µM) or naltrexone (10 nM) (Reith lab).
The indicated fixed concentration of ibogaine was co-present with increasing concentrations of morphine (colored curves). Otherwise as in Figure 2 .
Figure 5.
Effect of ibogaine and 18-MC on [35S]GTPγS binding in Sprague-Dawley rat thalamic membranes compared with DAMGO (Reith lab).
Tissue suspension aliquots were incubated with indicated drug and 0.09 nM of [35S]GTPγS for 1 h at 30°C. Data are expressed as % of maximal stimulation by 10 µM DAMGO and presented as mean ± SEM (vertical bar) for 3 - 4 independent experiments assayed in triplicate.
Figure 6.
Effect of noribogaine on [35S]GTPγS binding in Sprague-Dawley rat thalamic membranes compared with DAMGO and buprenorphine (BUP) (Reith lab).
Otherwise as in Figure 5.
Figure 7.
Antagonism of DAMGO (1 µM)-induced [35S]GTPγS binding in Sprague-Dawley rat thalamic membranes by ibogaine, noribogaine, and 18-MC (Reith lab).
Degree of stimulation by drug alone, i.e., 1 µM DAMGO, 100 µM 18-MC, 100 µM noribogaine (NOR), or 100 µM ibogaine (IBO) is indicated by the symbols on the left. The colored curves represent the effect of increasing the concentration of the respective iboga alkaloids co-incubated with 1 µM DAMGO (5 independent experiments). Otherwise as in Figures 5 and 6.
Figure 8.
Effect on [35S]GTPγS binding of noribogaine (Noribo) by itself and in combination with DAMGO (1 µM) in Sprague-Dawley rat thalamic membranes (Childers lab).
Tissue suspension aliquots were incubated with the indicated drug and 0.05 nM of [35S]GTPγS for 2 h at 30°C. DAMGO and naloxone (Nalox) were used as controls. Data are expressed as % of baseline and are from a representative experiment performed three times.
Figure 9.
Effect of noribogaine (30 µM) compared with DAMGO (3 µM) on [35S]GTPγS binding measured by autoradiography in brain slices from Sprague-Dawley rats (Childers lab).
Coronal sections were incubated with 0.04 nM of [35S]GTPγS for 2 h at 30°C with or without 3 µM DAMGO or 30 µM noribogaine. Basal binding was deducted to obtain net agonist-stimulated binding. Results shown are from a representative experiment, carried out three times in sections from three individual rats.