Figure 1.
Difference in mean RTs between validly cued and invalidly cued conditions (in ms) across all trials (overall), across trials in which participants made no eye movements during the presentation of the face pair (covert trials), and across trials in which participants made any eye movement towards one of the faces during their presentation (overt trials) in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 (error bars represent the standard error of the mean; * p<.05).
Positive values indicate an attentional bias towards threat (i.e., faster RTs in validly cued compared with invalidly cued trials).
Table 1.
Mean RTs for validly cued and invalidly cued conditions (in ms; SD in parenthesis) across all trials (overall), across trials in which participants made no eye movements during the face pair presentation (covert) and across trials in which participants made any eye movement towards one of the faces (overt).