Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the patients with breast carcinoma.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Immunohistochemical detection of tumor-associated macrophages (marker CD68) in breast cancer tissues.

(A) High-infiltration specimen (x 100) (B) High-infiltration specimen (x 400) (C) Low-infiltration specimen (x 100) (D) Low-infiltration specimen (x 400).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlation of TAM expression with prognosis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Correlation between CD68 expression and various clinicopathological features.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier analysis for DFS and OS based on CD68 expression in breast cancer patients.

(A) Kaplan–Meier analysis for DFS based on CD68 expression in patients with breast cancer (log-rank test, P = 0.012) (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis for OS based on CD68 expression in patients with breast cancer (log-rank test, P<0.001). Green: TAM-low group; Blue: TAM-high group.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Overall survival and disease-free interval according to clinical stage and lymph node status.

(A) DFS in stage I-II patients, P = 0.027 (B) OS in stage I-II patients, P = 0.025 (C) DFS in stage III patients, P = 0.134 (D) OS in stage III patients, P<0.001 (E) DFS in node-negative patients, P = 0.033 (F) OS in node-negative patients, P = 0.013. Green: TAM-low group; Blue: TAM-high group.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Table 4.

Prognostic factors in the Cox proportional hazards model.

More »

Table 4 Expand