Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Flow chart of study selection for inclusion in the systematic review.

1After removal of duplicates 2Articles may have been excluded for multiple reasons.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of studies of HIV and obstetric complications which included births by vaginal delivery.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of studies of HIV and obstetric complications which only looked at births by caesarean section.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Risk of bias within studies which include vaginal deliveries.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Risk of bias within caesarean section studies.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 2.

Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and obstetric haemorrhage in studies with vaginal deliveries only or included both vaginal deliveries and c-section deliveries.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and hypertensive diseases of pregnancy.

*Adjusted odds ratio.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and dystocia.

*Adjusted odds ratio.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and intrauterine infection.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and intrauterine infection in studies which only looked at caesarean deliveries.

*Adjusted odds ratio.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

Forest plot showing the strength of association between HIV and caesarean section in studies included in this systematic review.

More »

Figure 7 Expand