Figure 1.
Grand-average ERP.
Figure 2.
Lines indicate the number of subjects showing significant differences between conditions.
Figure 3.
Global field potentials for the difference-waves for all three comparisons.
Figure 4.
Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 300 and 400 ms for the comparison target minus standard.
Figure 5.
Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 300 and 400 ms for the comparison distractor minus standard.
Figure 6.
Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 200 and 400 ms for the comparison cat minus door.
Table 1.
Summary of effects for individual subjects.
Figure 7.
Difference spectrogram standard-target averaged across subjects.
Figure 8.
Difference spectrogram standard-distractor averaged across subjects.
Figure 9.
Difference spectrogram target-distractor averaged across subjects.
Figure 10.
Coloring indicates the number of subjects showing significant differences between standard vs. target.
Figure 11.
Coloring indicates the number of subjects showing significant differences between standard vs. distractor.
Figure 12.
Coloring indicates the number of subjects showing significant differences between target and distractor.
Figure 13.
Difference spectrogram for standard minus target on electrode Pz.
Scale indicates negative values from −5 in blue, values near zero in light green and positive values in yellow and red up to 5
.
Figure 14.
Difference spectrogram for standard minus distractor on electrode Pz.
Scale indicates negative values from −5 in blue, values near zero in light green and positive values in yellow and red up to 5
.
Figure 15.
Difference spectrogram for target minus distractor on electrode Pz.
Scale indicates negative values from −5 in blue, values near zero in light green and positive values in yellow and red up to 5
.