Figure 1.
Mean points (± SE) allocated to each trait according to participants’ sex in Experiment 1.
Within each “Participant’s Sex” group, means with different letters are significantly different from one another, as determined by Bonferroni-Holm post-hoc comparisons.
Figure 2.
Mean points (± SE) allocated to each trait according to scenario in Experiment 1.
Within each “Scenario” group, means with different letters are significantly different from one another, as determined by Bonferroni-Holm post-hoc comparisons.
Figure 3.
Mean points (± SE) allocated to each trait according to participants’ sex and scenario in Experiment 1.
Within each “Participant’s Sex x Scenario” group, means with different letters are significantly different from one another, as determined by Bonferroni-Holm post-hoc comparisons.
Figure 4.
Mean points (± SE) allocated to each trait according to participants’ sex in Experiment 2.
Within each “Participant’s Sex” group, means with different letters are significantly different from one another, as determined by Bonferroni-Holm post-hoc comparisons.
Figure 5.
Mean points (± SE) allocated to each trait according to experimenter’s sex in Experiment 2.
Within each “Experimenter’s Sex” group, means with different letters are significantly different from one another, as determined by Bonferroni-Holm post-hoc comparisons.