Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Selection of studies for the meta-analysis of IOUS associated negative margins of breast cancer.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of eligible studies about the efficacy of IOUS on margin status included in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary ORs or RRs and 95% CI of IOUS associated negative margins.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 2.

Impact of IOUS on rates of negative margins of all breast cancers (prospective studies).

Forest plot for meta-analysis of prospective studies: rate of negative margins of all breast cancers (including non-palpable and palpable breast cancers) in IOUS group compared with that in control group without IOUS. The width of the horizontal line represents the 95% CI of the individual study, and the square proportional represents the weight of each study. The diamond represents the pooled RR and 95% CI.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Impact of IOUS on rates of negative margins of all breast cancers (retrospective studies).

Forest plot for meta-analysis of retrospective studies: rate of negative margins of breast cancers (including non-palpable and palpable breast cancers) in IOUS group compared with that in control group without IOUS. The width of the horizontal line represents the 95% CI of the individual study, and the square proportional represents the weight of each study. The diamond represents the pooled OR and 95% CI.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Impact of IOUS on rates of negative margins of non-palpable breast cancers (prospective studies).

Forest plot for meta-analysis of prospective studies: rate of negative margins of non-palpable breast cancers in IOUS group compared with that in GWL group. The width of the horizontal line represents the 95% CI of the individual study, and the square proportional represents the weight of each study. The diamond represents the pooled RR and 95% CI.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Impact of IOUS on rates of negative margins of non-palpable breast cancers (retrospective studies).

Forest plot for meta-analysis of retrospective studies: rate of negative margins of non-palpable breast cancers in IOUS group compared with that in GWL group. The width of the horizontal line represents the 95% CI of the individual study, and the square proportional represents the weight of each study. The diamond represents the pooled OR and 95% CI.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Impact of IOUS on rates of negative margins of palpable breast cancers.

Forest plot for meta-analysis: rate of negative margins of palpable breast cancers in IOUS group compared with that in control group without IOUS. The width of the horizontal line represents the 95% CI of the individual study, and the square proportional represents the weight of each study. The diamond represents the pooled RR or OR and 95% CI.

More »

Figure 6 Expand