Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Participants description, neuropsychological assessment and group comparisons for the whole sample.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Factor structure of the neuropsychological assessment protocol.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Figure 1.

Stepwise linear regression model for the association between cognitive and functional measures.

Legend: the four components extracted on the factor analysis (Episodic Memory, Executive Functions, Language/Semantic Memory and Visuospatial Abilities) were used as independent predictors of older adults performance on Activities of Daily Living. Three of the four components (excluding Visuospatial Abilities) explained about 30% of functional performance variance.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 3.

NA, MCI and AD non-depressed patients' description and ROC Curve Analysis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

Stepwise multinomial regression models for the classification of the participants.

Legend: increase on the classification rate of the participants by the use of different neuropsychological tests. The final model contains tests of general cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination), Episodic Memory (Delayed Recall and Recognition from the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test), Executive Functions (Category Fluency Test “Animals” and the Frontal Assessment Battery) and Language/Semantic Memory (Laboratory of Neuropsychological Investigations Naming Test “Nouns”). Considering its general accuracy the protocol improves the classification rate of the participant's in 47%, starting at chance (33%). Its accuracy is greater for the identification of normal Aging (54%) followed by AD (47%) and MCI (42%), which reflect the intermediate condition of this last group.

More »

Figure 2 Expand