Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics in Experiments 1 and 2.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Stimuli characteristics for matched cognate and noncognate words in Experiment 1.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Japanese-English bilinguals’ mean response latencies and error rates for Experiments 1 and 2.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Final model for picture naming: Fixed effects.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Final model for picture naming: Random effects.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Figure 1.

P and S similarity in L2 picture naming.

For illustration purposes, S and P similarity ratings were divided into two equal groups along the median rating (Low, High).

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

P similarity and L2 word frequency in L2 picture naming.

For illustration purposes, P similarity ratings and log-transformed word frequency (taken from BNC [30]) were divided into two equal groups along the median rating (Low, High).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 6.

Stimuli characteristics for cognate and noncognate matched groups.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Final model for lexical decision: Fixed effects.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Final model for lexical decision: Random effects.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Final model with concreteness and number of English senses as additional predictors: Fixed effects.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Final model with concreteness and number of English senses as additional predictors: Random effects.

More »

Table 10 Expand